The Sierra Club has a history of involvement in housing issues. We have long-standing policies that strongly support infill projects, reducing pollution, and preserving the natural environment in relation to housing development.
We also support affordable housing as a matter of social justice. This aspect of California’s affordable housing crisis was summed up in the March 25 New York Times by California state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Dr. Daniel Kammen, professor of energy at UC Berkeley: “By making housing shockingly expensive near jobs and transit, cities force low-income and working-class people to live far away from where they work. Our communities lose their economic diversity, while the abundant opportunities, services, and neighborhood amenities of cities are walled off to all but the very wealthy.”
That’s a good backdrop against which to view San Luis Obispo County 4th District Supervisor Lynn Compton’s notorious preferred solution to the crisis: Young people should study the most potentially lucrative subjects in college so they can get jobs that will make them rich enough to afford a home.
It’s also an appropriate backdrop for the recent “landmark” deal on affordable housing brokered by the county Board of Supervisors, which effected a compromise that threw in the towel on the county’s longstanding goal of ramping up to a requirement that all residential development projects include 20 percent affordable units. The county’s compromise deal set the bar at “a fixed 8 percent requirement.”
The city of SLO appears to be in the grips of the notion that the city can build its way out of the affordable housing crisis by issuing permits to all comers, along with waivers from the general plan and established environmental requirements for orderly development, without much pondering of just how a rapidly increasing supply of $600,000-and-up, three-bedroom, single-family homes is going to solve a crisis of affordability.
How do these outcomes square with workforce housing pilot programs and affordable housing incentives at the county and the city, and how can those outcomes be improved?
To help answer that question, the Sierra Club is hosting a town hall on affordable housing on May 15 at the Copeland Pavilion at French Medical Center. It’s open to all.
The Copeland Pavilion is at 1823 Johnson Ave., third floor. There’s parking in the back. The meeting starts at 7 p.m.
Postscript: Recently, in this space (“A Terrible Deal,” March 14), Al Fonzi tried to defend a core belief in the mythology of climate change denial, writing that “there’s been virtually no measurable or statistically relevant warming of the climate for nearly the last 20 years (since 1998), and the climate models that are predicting an overheated planet didn’t foresee this and can’t explain it.” In support of this claim, Mr. Fonzi sought to enlist former NASA scientist James Hansen, who was “reported to have stated ‘that nature may conspire [over] the next 10 years to produce the impression of an ongoing pause in global warming.'”
Hansen’s actual quote, from the paper “Global Temperature in 2017,” reads thusly: “Because of the combination of the strong 2016 El Niño and the phase of the solar cycle, it is plausible, if not likely, that the next 10 years of global temperature change will leave an impression of a ‘global warming hiatus.'”
In other words, Hansen’s quote provided precisely zero support for Fonzi’s claim. I asked Dr. Hansen what he thought about Mr. Fonzi’s interpretation of his words and received the following response: “He is speaking nonsense. Why don’t you send him the up-to-date global temperature graph below and ask where the hiatus or slowdown in warming is.”
Happy to oblige.
The peddling of fringe theories supported by deliberate distortions and nonsensical arguments raises a question for newspapers and journalists who believe in “both sides” journalism: What is their obligation to provide a megaphone for the pollution of the public dialogue by those who wish to proclaim not only that the Earth is flat, but assure the citizenry that the theater is not on fire as the flames spread across the mezzanine and leap up the curtain? Δ
Andrew Christie is director of the Santa Lucia chapter of the Sierra Club. Send comments through the editor at clanham@newtimesslo.com or get your thoughts published by emailing a letter to letters@newtimesslo.com.
This article appears in Apr 4-14, 2019.
Thank you to you Mr Christie and the Sierra Club for all your work supporting our community. And a special thank you for helping to keep Mr Fonzi in check.
Housing (and commercial rentals) are really expensive because there is more demand than there is supply. That’s simple enough. The size of the houses built is more a result of the high priced market, less a cause of the high priced market.
The real question is, are we willing to pay more money to the people who own the property, in trade to regulate the size of the population and keep the “small town” feel?
So far, the answer has been a resounding yes (not a surprise when you think about who makes these decisions and who gets the money).
Get your yellow vests on. The rich aren’t going cooperate willingly. Capitalism (liberalism) will turn this country into Brazil if it isn’t stopped by an outside force.
“without much pondering of just how a rapidly increasing supply of $600,000-and-up, three-bedroom, single-family homes is going to solve a crisis of affordability.”
Because rich people move here anyways, so if you don’t build the housing, they outbid what was formerly affordable.
As for the 20% requirement, go look at SF (the hottest housing market in the US) and see that the requirement for 21% subsidized housing just stopped all development. Housing starts tanked. And then you get the result described above. 20% doesn’t work unless you have significant government-given incentives to do so (like density bonuses).
So this liberal is extreme skeptical of super-high affordability requirements without development incentives – because the result is actually less development, simply benefiting those who already have housing.