Dozens of Americans were killed in a string of unrelated mass shootings at the end of July and beginning of August, and support is building among Republican legislators for federal gun control measures like those outlined in a bill authored by Congressman Salud Carbajal (D-Santa Barbara).
In a televised address on Aug. 5 regarding back-to-back-to-back mass shootings in California, Texas, and Ohio, President Donald Trump announced his support for “red flag laws” that would make it easier for law enforcement officials to temporarily take firearms from individuals who pose a threat to themselves or others.
“We must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms, and that if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process,” Trump said in his address. “That is why I have called for red flag laws, also known as extreme risk protection orders.”
The Extreme Risk Protection Order Act of 2019, House Resolution 1236, was reintroduced by Congressman Carbajal in February, and would set up a grant program to incentivize state, tribal, and local governments to adopt laws aimed at reducing gun deaths and injuries.
Extreme risk laws allow families or law enforcement to obtain court orders temporarily prohibiting individuals who pose a threat from owning firearms. If such a prohibition is ordered, the laws also allow law enforcement to physically take firearms out of an individual’s possession temporarily.
If passed, the act would make grant funding available to jurisdictions that adopt extreme risk gun laws, allowing law enforcement and court implementation training.
“You don’t just want these laws enacted,” Carbajal told New Times. “You want as many law enforcement officers and community members to understand what they are and how they’re implemented. Training and awareness. That’s part of what my bill would do.”
Advocates consider extreme risk laws a critical tool in gun violence prevention, as so often after mass shootings, it’s revealed that family members and law enforcement in the shooter’s community saw dangerous and concerning behavior from the individual before the shooting occurred. Often, the ability to intervene in these circumstances is limited, but extreme risk laws enable that intervention, Carbajal said.
Some states already have extreme risk laws in place. After the Isla Vista shooting in May 2014, California passed a law allowing law enforcement and family members to get court-ordered “gun violence restraining orders” prohibiting dangerous individuals from possessing firearms. That went into effect in January 2016, and since then, most counties in the state have rarely granted gun violence restraining orders.
San Luis Obispo County has issued three gun violence restraining orders since the law went into effect, according to data collected by the state Department of Justice. While Santa Barbara County has issued more than 20, it’s the exception. Santa Barbara County has used gun violence restraining orders more than almost any other county in the state, second only to Los Angeles.
The Extreme Risk Protection Order Act has more than 130 co-sponsors in the House, and Carbajal said it’s likely to move forward soon.
This article appears in Aug 8-18, 2019.
Does anyone believe Trump will follow thru with what he said?
How about a local gun buy back or turn in program? Need it now!
How about not selling military guns/ammo in CA and USA? Need it now!
People do these things for a reason, and the reasons they’re doing it is what matters, not the fact that they’re able to. If not guns, they’d just be ramming trucks into crowds of people as they do in Europe. Fifty bucks at Home Depot can do vastly more damage than a firearm. If you already have it in you to commit mass murder, you will find a way.
There have been ~250 mass shootings this year. The bourgeois liberal gets understandably nervous at the small handful of white, educated, politically motivated shooters, coming for him in the suburbs, shopping malls, and corporate parks. But a black person in the ghetto spraying 3 or 4 dead as a daily occurrence is ignorable, an unfortunate but acceptable externality of the system the liberal supports. Both scenarios indicate massive societal failings. There should be 0 mass murders in a normal society. America is collapsing into chaos for reasons leadership is unwilling or incapable of addressing. It’s almost like it’s beneficial to their narrative.
The mass murders have absolutely nothing to do with guns. Guns are much harder to get today. I remember my father talking about being able to buy a gun at the hardware store, no checks, you pay and it’s yours. There were no shootings then. I think deep down everyone knows all this, but we have been so brow beaten to accept whatever garbage the media peddles, so tired and overworked, so devastated to see the country collapse all around us. Red flag laws are a fear driven and impotent measure by a narcissistic society that will only increase the death count.
Kate, you really cut through the garbage so many of us believe as absolute truth!