California is America’s most populous state at 39.5 million residents, and it has America’s greatest GDP—the fourth largest in the world. Yet, somehow, among all of those millions, there is not one who is fit to lead our state? Do we really need a failed political hack who left Great Britain in 2012, who only became a citizen of the United States in 2021, to lead the Golden State? Whatever happened to “America First”? What about “California First”? Californians do not need yet another outsider telling us that they know what’s best for us! Political failure in Britain and a spot on Fox News does not qualify someone to lead California. Two hundred and fifty years after severing ties with the British, we don’t need one of their lackeys coming here to establish his own little fiefdom.

Stephen Siemsen

Orcutt

Submit a Letter

Name(Required)
Not shown on Web Site

Local News: Committed to You, Fueled by Your Support.

Local news strengthens San Luis Obispo County. Help New Times continue delivering quality journalism with a contribution to our journalism fund today.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Does California need a billionaire chameleon, who has spent $200 million of his own money to buy himself the governorship? Like the chameleon, Steyer readily changes his political appearance to suit his environment, changing from hedge fund investor in private prisons, to fiery progressive, when the political winds made it advantageous. Or do we need a candidate like Bacerra, who spent his career pushing the ever-worsening economic wreckage of California over a cliff, before going to Washington to work his “magic” on the entire country as part of the feckless and inept Biden administration which accomplished the seemingly impossible by getting a deeply loathed Trump reelected?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *