COMMUNITY SUPPORT In 2017, when the Trump administration announced plans to end DACA, community members in San Luis Obispo gathered in support of the program and its recipients. Credit: File Photo By Jayson Mellom

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments against the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program on Nov. 12, and while no decision has been made, the court indicated it might allow the current administration to end it. In the wake of the hearing, local higher educational institutions continue to support the DACA community.

Cal Poly Dream Center Coordinator Katherine Zevallos Pastor said in an emailed statement to New Times that the center acknowledges the anxiety, stress, and worry the local undocumented community is experiencing during these times.

COMMUNITY SUPPORT In 2017, when the Trump administration announced plans to end DACA, community members in San Luis Obispo gathered in support of the program and its recipients. Credit: File Photo By Jayson Mellom

“We reiterate our commitment to all undocumented students, those with or without DACA, and remind them that they belong at Cal Poly,” Pastor said. “We encourage all allies to recognize the additional personal challenges and stress that can manifest for undocumented individuals during this time, and we want our campus community to know that our Dream Center is a resource for those who need support.”

The CSU board of trustees and the Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, made up of American college and university leaders, joined more than 165 colleges and universities throughout the country in signing an amicus brief in the case before the Supreme Court.

Cal Poly and Cuesta College are both members of the Presidents’ Alliance.

The “friend-of-the-court” brief filed on Oct. 4 by Perkins Coie LLP, which has an office in Washington, D.C., stated the positive effects DACA had on college campuses as well as testimonials from current and past DACA students.

“They have worked and studied in American schools; have prepared and trained for all manner of careers; and have strived to innovate, achieve, and serve their communities,” the brief states.

The Central Coast Coalition for Undocumented Student Success sent out a call for action urging Central Coast colleges, universities, and K-12 administrators to formally issue a public statement reaffirming their support of DACA, continue to assist eligible program recipients to renew their DACA, and identify funding sources to assist with renewal fees.

“In the event that DACA is terminated, we urge all Central Coast colleges, universities, and K-12 leadership to rapidly create formal action plans to ensure affected students are able to continue their education without interruption, and specifically address the financial and mental health needs and impacts caused by DACA termination,” coalition officials stated.

On Nov. 8, the current administration proposed an increase in immigration fees—including DACA renewal requests, which would go from $495 to $765. Δ

Local News: Committed to You, Fueled by Your Support.

Local news strengthens San Luis Obispo County. Help New Times continue delivering quality journalism with a contribution to our journalism fund today.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. There seems to be some remarkably one sided thinking going on here. Many of the “DACA” young people were not brought here as young children, but as teenagers. They came with their parents in violation of our border laws. They are not “stateless” as they came from other countries where they are entitled to live.

    We have been paying for these students with our federal and state tax dollars. The federal legislature makes the laws, and those laws have been violated by these students. Mr. Obama said he would not enforce our laws, by executive order (such is the power of the presidency). But that order does not survive the end of his term. Mr. Trump has the same authority; that is, to allow the laws made by Congress to be enforced.

    If we want to incorporate DACA in our laws, the proper place to do so is in the “people’s house” (the Congress) which makes our laws. Not in the courts, which are established to interpret our laws. Otherwise, the judiciary becomes both judge and rulemaker; a role not envisioned in the Constitution.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *