The Central Coast environmental community gave federal officials a tongue lashing on May 22 in the Embassy Suites hotel in San Luis Obispo, berating the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) for its plan to grow oil and gas production on public lands across Central California.
Following a rally in the parking lot of the hotel led by SLO Mayor Heidi Harmon and leaders of environmental groups, including the Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity, more than 200 people poured into a conference room.
“Public lands are ours to enjoy, not yours to destroy,” read signs that were handed out to meeting attendees.

The DOI’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) hosted the meeting as it’s taking public comment on an environmental document that addresses increases in hydraulic fracking that are laid out in the BLM Bakersfield Office’s resource management plan.
Before handing the mic to members of the public, a BLM representative gave a brief presentation on the plan, which opens nearly 1 million acres of land in eight counties to new oil and gas leases, including 125,000 acres of SLO County.
Among the sites listed are areas in the Irish Hills Natural Reserve, Montaña de Oro State Park, and parcels near the Carrizo Plain, Lake Nacimiento, and Camp Roberts.
The BLM has not issued a new oil or gas lease in California in more than five years. But up to 400 new wells could be drilled in the next decade, with as many as 40 wells fracked, according to the BLM’s environmental document on fracking. That report largely concludes that the environmental impacts would be “negligible.”
Nearly all those who spoke at the May 22 meeting disagreed.
Emphasizing oil drilling and fracking’s effect on water and air quality, seismicity, climate change, and public enjoyment, speakers ranging from political leaders, to teachers, to indigenous tribal members railed against the BLM proposal.
“Opening these areas for oil and gas development, including well stimulation, puts our drinking water supplies, air quality and recreational opportunities, public health, and tourism at stake,” said Mayor Harmon to thunderous applause from the audience.
A representative for U.S. Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Santa Barbara) read a statement for the congressman that called on the BLM to abandon the plan.
“The BLM’s plan stands in stark contrast with California’s energy goals,” Carbajal’s statement read. “Fracking also presents an unacceptable risk to California’s precious groundwater resources.”
Candice Kim, of the Center for Biological Diversity, said California residents could not trust regulatory systems to protect them from the impacts of oil production. Kim noted that local oil producer Sentinel Peak Resources was recently granted an aquifer exemption to inject wastewater from the Price Canyon Oil Field into portions of the Arroyo Grande aquifer.
“The EPA just granted a giveaway of a local aquifer. That social safety net has failed this community,” Kim said.
Many speakers discussed the urgency of the broader climate change crisis, expressing dismay that the federal government would allow oil and gas expansion on public lands.
“In this day and age of climate change, any new production of oil is inherently and massively irresponsible,” SLO resident Lizza Demsetz said. “When it comes to this proposal, the choice is really simple. We need to keep the moratorium on so we can come back … for solar or wind production.”
Attendees also lambasted the BLM for not recording the meeting or taking speakers’ comments into the record. BLM officials asked for comments to be submitted in writing online or in the mail. The meeting grew heated and personal at times, with some speakers taking direct aim at the few BLM officials in the room.
Charles Varni, a resident who led the campaign for Measure G, a failed 2018 ballot initiative that would’ve banned fracking and new oil wells locally, called on residents to continue the fight.
“Let’s consider this a rally for climate crisis warriors,” Varni said. “The BLM is directed by politicians, who are directed by fossil fuel oligarchs and corporations fueled with millions of dollars, like the $8 million they spent to defeat Measure G.”
The BLM’s public comment period remains open through June 10. Δ
This article appears in May 30 – Jun 9, 2019.


Do the benefits of fracking outweigh the costs? Our regional housing policies require many people to drive to work. Is it better to get the oil from Saudi Arabia than from California?
It’s better to get our transportation and residential energy from wind and solar. The atmosphere (and our species) cannot tolerate any increased greenhouse gas emissions. Human caused global warming is real and will have catatrophic consequences for us if we do not change quickly. Keep fossil fuels in the ground.
We’ve been telling you for years… this will happen in Price Canyon (near Pismo Beach), it will happen in Cat Canyon and elsewhere. Stop Steam Injection and Fracking. We allow them to pump shit into the ground and it shows up in the water… The study found:
4 out of 16 wells sampled in the Orcutt field had geochemical indicators of oil-field fluids mixed with groundwater.
Methane and other gases may be migrating through formations along leaky wells/wellbores or faults and mixing with overlying groundwater.
Evidence of wastewater from oil extraction was also discovered in the groundwater.
https://www.edhat.com/news/oil-field-conta…
Mr. Varni avoiding reality again. The “lets use wind and solar” sounds nice until people realize is not even close to being realistic. I’d love to see a REALISTIC detailed plan on how California is going to stop using 2 million barrels of oil every day to meet our energy needs. If you can provide that, I’ll support your position! And don’t tell me the “green new deal” is a realistic plan, it’s a joke. Until you or one of the other “climate crisis warriors” can provide that, I’ll keep supporting low cost energy that gives under-served communities access to cheaper food and transportation.
Solar and wind? I can’t even afford a home.
These fake environmentalists are just fanning their own balls engaging in social status signaling. How many of these people are democrats, the party that has started illegal wars, the party that supports privatization and neoliberalism. (not that republicans are different but we’re talking about rich central coast liberals here, “progressives” they call themselves LOL).
Rich techo-fascists from coastal California installing solar and wind on their homes won’t stop the collapse of the post WW2 liberal order. We’ve actually looked at the data (and I should know I work in the industry) and what we found was that best efforts will only have solar and wind at 2% of projected energy demand in the next 30 years. The only thing that can take up the slack after oil runs out is some kind of fusion source. But go ahead and have your rich people status signaling festivals for votes. I suppose it’s a more worthwhile activity than having a “working lunch” with corrupt land developers and drug dealers.
Namaste
The Central Coast environmental community gave federal officials a tongue lashing on May 22 in the Embassy Suites hotel in San Luis Obispo, berating the U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) for its plan to grow oil and gas production on public lands across Central California. I was at this event . Only at most 50 so people in the photo about. Some from CalPoly and the local groups. None knowing the BS to come over this all. Two clamming to have been at Standing Rock. Noon willing to put boots on the group for the real fight to come. So what’s next SLO County.!?! It was all talk , with NO actions to be done.