Kenney Enney’s ranch in northern San Luis Obispo County butts up against the heart of Paso Robles’ wine country. Vines dominate the arid summer landscape east of San Miguel until the grapes give way to his 850 acres of grain, cattle, and untouched open space.
“My joke is I’m the defender of the rangeland,” said Enney. “Because when you come out here, you look south and see the vineyards come right up to my edge.”
The retired U.S. Marine colonel, whose plaid shirt is spotted with dirt after a day’s work, is not exaggerating. A ranch road winds for more than a mile on his property, up a hill to a vista point that shows the vineyards and wineries splaying in all directions throughout the valley below.

For Enney, growing grapes isn’t an option. Water restrictions over the Paso Robles Groundwater Basin prevent him and others from increasing their irrigation, so he’s all but stuck making a living off grains and cattle, a lifestyle that’s close to economically unviable these days.
“With the drought cycle that’s becoming shorter and shorter, it’s harder and harder to grow grain,” Enney said. “And the cattle is hardly bringing in anything at all.”
Veering off from the vista point, a dirt road connects two pads of gravel spaced about 50 yards apart. Each contains a large canvas tent with a bed inside, as well as picnic tables, fire pits, and other camping amenities.
About five years ago, Enney had the idea to put private campsites on his ranch. He thought back to his military days, when he’d stay in canvas tents overseas in sometimes beautiful and interesting places. At first, he wanted to host service members there as part of the Wounded Warrior Project, a nonprofit that offers support to veterans or active duty soldiers recovering from combat injuries.
“I wanted to showcase the nature out here and for them to enjoy the rangeland,” Enney said.
After hosting some retreats, one military visitor made the suggestion: Why doesn’t he rent out his four campsites to the public? In 2018, Enney signed up as a host on Hipcamp, an app that connects rural landowners with campers interested in unique outdoor experiences. At the time, the concept seemed relatively new for the area, he said.
“I looked at it like nobody else was doing it,” Enney said. “Every time you go camping in California, they cram you 10 feet away from someone else and [you have to reserve it] weeks in advance. And initially the idea was to have the campsites spread apart so you wouldn’t see another one.”
In the years since—especially since the start of the pandemic—Hipcamp and other platforms like it have taken off on the Central Coast, and across the state and country.
According to company data, SLO County now has more than 70 hosts, on properties ranging from “cattle ranches, to working vineyards, to family owned preserves and apple orchards” across 85,000 acres, and they inject $3.2 million per year of spending into the economy.
For Enney, the pandemic pushed his campsites to 80 percent occupancy as business went “gangbusters.” Priced at $75 per night each, he said the sites have become a crucial financial lifeline for his family and his ability to own and live on the ranch. On the flip side, they’re also a desperately needed respite for campers who were cooped up inside during the pandemic.
“During COVID, I had parents whose kids had not been outside for weeks. I had kids that came out here who didn’t realize there were that many stars,” Enney said. “I’m catering to young couples, young families that just want to unplug and go out and listen to the owls, coyotes, and cattle.”
Regulating recreation
Enney’s story is actually a common one among Hipcamp hosts, and it gets at the core of the company’s mission, according to Michal Rosenoer, a senior manager of government and community relations at Hipcamp.
“We really believe that opening up private land for outdoor recreation not only takes pressure off public spaces that we know are completely overrun and really impacted right now, but also supplies rural landowners, primarily farmers and ranchers, with the opportunity to develop a secondary revenue stream,” Rosenoer told Get Outside, “which is really important for keeping those lands undeveloped in the face of drought, rising costs, things like that. It’s a win-win for outdoor recreation and agriculture.”
While Hipcamp and its hosts see it that way, not everyone in the community is so enthusiastic about the new niche of agri-tourism. Critics raise concerns about fire safety, health and sanitation, noise, traffic, and other neighbor-to-neighbor impacts that stem from the private campsites.
Many of those concerns are valid, Enney said, especially absent clear rules and guidelines for the industry. As the number of Hipcamp sites proliferates, SLO County and many local jurisdictions lag behind in developing clear rules and permit processes to address them. In SLO, that’s caused angst for both hosts and community members.

“Today, our absence of rules is creating problems across the county,” SLO County Farm Bureau Executive Director Brent Burchett wrote in a letter to the Board of Supervisors last year. “We believe it is important to put clear rules in place that give the county the tools it needs to stop bad actors while creating a new opportunity for farmers, ranchers, and rural property owners.”
Enney described his experience of trying to permit his campsites with the county as “a battle.”
He said that since 2018, county officials have “changed their mind about four times” on what kind of permits he needs, and he’s been hit with multiple fines over the years totaling thousands of dollars. As a “retired military guy,” Enney said he wanted to follow the rules and be a good steward of the land, but the county doesn’t seem to know what it wants.
“It was easier to build my house out here then it was to put a tent up,” Enney said. “Every time I think I’ve done what they’ve wanted me to do, they came back to throw something else out. … I’m kind of at a point, honestly, where there’s no justification for what they’re doing. They’re blocking other people. I really feel sorry for some of the young families [who own ranches]. They don’t have any other options, really.”
Last year, amid calls from the community to address the regulatory issues, the SLO County Board of Supervisors directed its staff to develop a new ordinance for private rural camping like Hipcamps. The current applicable rules are outdated and expensive to follow, locals told the board. They limit what’s possible (like requiring 1,000-foot property setbacks for campsites) and don’t take into account issues like fire safety and neighborhood impacts.
According to Rosenoer of Hipcamp, SLO isn’t alone in its struggle to adapt its camping regulations to today’s world.
“In most counties, land use codes don’t address private land camping,” Rosenoer explained. “This land use is a really new concept. But because the code doesn’t address it, you have to go through some really expensive, long-term permitting processes—upwards of 18 months and sometimes upwards of $100,000—just to get a yes or no answer from the county about whether they think what you’re doing is appropriate or not.”
Over the past year, Rosenoer has worked directly with property owners in SLO County who have reached out for help understanding the county’s permitting system and to advocate for new regulations that provide a clearer path to success—even providing SLO a potential draft of an ordinance.
One of those locals, Mok Singh, a small vineyard owner in Paso Robles, said he wants to become a Hipcamp host after hearing the appeal from visitors to “be near the earth, sounds, sights, and smell of the viticulture environment.” But the current rules make that unattainable for him on his few dozen acres.
“I began looking into this and I noticed that the county had an ordinance with qualifications that were extremely onerous,” Singh said. “There are several farmers in our community who’d want to do something like this and would benefit from it. It’s extremely hard for a small farmer or a small viticulturalist to even break even on growing fruit and selling fruit because, unless you’re one of the really big players who have economies of scale as a benefit, our costs for producing wine grapes is so high that forget about being able to pay a mortgage, it’s hard to even sell the fruit for enough to pay for the farming practices. Quite frankly, I’d be in a position where if I couldn’t find other revenue streams to help, I’d probably have to sell my vineyard.”
While the ball is finally rolling for Hipcamps in SLO County, officials say it might take 18 months to develop the new ordinance. To Enney, who is still resolving his longstanding issues with the county, that’s too long.
“I’m looking at the future of agriculture in California,” Enney said. “To keep the rangeland rangeland, to keep it from getting gobbled up, to try to be a good steward of the land, camping’s an easy way to do it.”
This article appears in Get Outside – Summer/Fall 2022.



There is another side to the topic of “Hip Camping.” The article implies through text and images that the Hip Camp sites are remote, and who could possibly object to them? Well, 100% of our neighbors on Loma Linda Drive near Creston object to Mok Singh’s Hip Camp. Mr. Singh graded a hill top immediately adjacent to our properties – about 30 ft for the closest structure, and 100 ft to the first Airstream trailer. You read that correctly – the first Airstream trailer. Mr. Singh has a total of five trailers clustered in a circle in his Hip Camp, all of them very close to our properties. He may call it a Hip Camp but it looks just like a trailer park.
The current regulations call for a 1000 ft setback from property lines and no high-density packing. Mr. Singh’s trailer park violates both of those regulations. I suspect he read the regulations after he built up the site.
My wife and I moved to our idyllic country home specifically to enjoy the peace and quiet, which has been wonderful. At night, with the windows open, all we hear are crickets and coyotes. If Mr. Singh gets his way, this will be ruined by the raucous parties when Mr. Singh’s guests come back from wine tasting all day and continue the fun after hours.
If Mr. Singh is so committed to the concept of Hip Camps, why doesn’t he simply move the trailers to his other property on the West side of Paso Robles? Is it perhaps because his residence is on the other property and he doesn’t want the noise and disruption where it has a personal impact on him?
My wife and I enjoy camping, but there’s a reason for the tight regulations surrounding them. We wouldn’t want to disrupt anyone else’s life. We and our neighbors are committed to fighting an unzoned trailer park popping up next to us, looking like particularly ugly fungus.
It is my opinion that the allowance of Rural Commercial Camping on Private Property will have such a potentially significant and adverse impact on the quality of life of our neighborhoods that this matter should be put on the ballot for a VOTE – so that the communities as a whole can decide if this is what the residents of SLO County actually want … vs. the desire of a few to make a small profit at the expense of the quality of life for their neighbors.
Presently, the San Luis Obispo County Code Enforcement Department does not have staffing available after business hours, nor, on weekends to respond to, and investigate, Violations of Code (with the exception of immediate life and safety matters) … Potentially, when ALL of the camping related violations , e.g., noise , setback, etc. will likely occur? So I ask this, who exactly is going to respond to all of the after hours noise complaints ? (Not to mention, when I last checked, the Code Enforcement office is several weeks behind in just keeping up with the current backlog of violations …). Even the best written ordinance is worthless, if there is no one who is going to enforce the many potential violations.
This initiative not only has the potential to disrupt our current quality of life, but it may very well turn neighbor vs. neighbor … when your neighbor’s hosted campers are violating the noise threshold at 1:00 in the morning and you call Code Enforcement and get only an answering machine … this will ultimately become a burden on the minimal resources of our Sheriffs Office – who will be the ones getting the noise complaint calls.
Put this matter before a VOTE to ensure that this is what the San Luis Obispo County Residents actually want … and if so, make sure that the County has Code Enforcement Resources available 24/7 to be able respond and take enforcement actions in a timely manner.
To me, this matter is very much like the Growing of Commercial Cannabis in SLO County …. nobody really cared, until their neighbor applied for a permit to grow Commercial Cannabis next door … don’t wait until this an issue in your own backyard … then it will be too late.
Wait. Mr. Rosenoer, who is employed by Hipcamp, is providing SLO with a potential draft for an ordinance? That doesn’t seem right. It is the Board of Supervisors’ job to create this ordinance–after much thoughtful consideration and a full exploration of all facets of the issue. And with public input. Who do you think Mr. Rosenoers’ recommendations’ are going to favor?
The enforcement point is a strong one in Mr. Edel’s comments above. According to this article, the current property setback requirements for Hipcamp-type businesses are 1,000 feet. My neighborhood has 5 shiny, new rv’s installed between 30 and 40 feet from a property line that looks down onto his property. Privacy? Consideration? Enforcement? What’s that?
Laws don’t amount to much if they are not crafted to be fair, respectful, and transparent. Then, you have to have the wherewithal to apply them equitably. I expect better from SLO County.
Bluntly, Mr. Singh is in clear violation of the current Rural Commercial Camping ordinance. Did he get permits for any of these improvements including grading, electrical and gas hookups? Highly doubtful as he has been issued code violations. Not only that, he has total disregard for the impact on neighboring properties. His Hipcamp is literally right in our backyards violating the 1000 ft setback. The elevation of his property is higher than our subject properties so the “trailer park” looks right down on to our yards and homes. If the County of San Luis Obispo allows this project we will all suffer loss of privacy, diminished property values, loss of rural atmosphere that we all love and our right to peace and quiet. There are at least nine properties that will be negatively impacted if this project is approved. Had Mr. Singh been thoughtful at all he could have proposed his project on the easterly portion of his property. There are no close neighbors to impact. Or, as pointed out by Mr. Penkauskas, he could have located his project on his westside Paso Robles property where he resides. Clearly he didn’t want it there and it doesn’t take rocket science to figure out why.
In the above article, Mr. Singh is quoted as saying …”It’s extremely hard for a small farmer or a small viticulturalist to even break even on growing fruit and selling fruit because, unless you’re one of the really big players who have economies of scale as a benefit, our costs for producing wine grapes is so high that forget about being able to pay a mortgage, it’s hard to even sell the fruit for enough to pay for the farming practices. Quite frankly, I’d be in a position where if I couldn’t find other revenue streams to help, I’d probably have to sell my vineyard.”
I find his statements regarding his hardship and need for additional revenue quite interesting as I have personally observed Mr. Singh driving through his Vineyard in his Maserati SUV !
I guess he wants to upgrade to a Bentley SUV ?
Need I say anything more ?