Thank you for your recent story about the proposed art district downtown and the $50 million parking structure to accommodate it (“Pay up: Parking costs are about to double for downtown SLO visitors,” March 2). The Shredder was right on the money (“Parking paradise,” March 2)!
Why would anyone even consider giving away/trading valuable city property and taking on another $50 million in bonded indebtedness to meet alleged future parking needs that the city’s own consultants see no need for? The council’s logic is, we don’t have the money now, but it will cost more in the future, so let’s go into more debt now, while interest rates are at their highest peak in 40 years, to build it and save some money in the future when we may need it!
The city has been technically insolvent for years, owing more than $160 million to CalPERS for employees’ retirements and millions more in outstanding bonds. The last thing the city needs to do is take on more debt for any reason.
Perhaps the council members have not been downtown recently to see the all the vacant retail spaces, many of which have been sitting empty for years now. Wouldn’t it be more prudent to find ways to get those spaces occupied and generating sales tax revenue?
SLO Rep claims it will draw 50,000 people downtown every year. With 206 seats, this means they plan to have 246 sold-out performances every year, or five sold-out performances every week. Is this realistic? Will theater patrons really park in a parking structure by the theater, walk around past the homeless to a restaurant, eat out, then walk back in the dark to go to the play? If they are just going to a performance and then going home, they are not benefitting downtown businesses.
I chaired the Promotional Coordinating Committee In the 1980s, when building a performing arts center was originally proposed. The reasons the PAC was ultimately put at Cal Poly and not downtown are still valid reasons today: The building would not be in use most of the time, the city would bear the brunt of maintenance, and it would eat up a large section of potentially more valuable (read: revenue-generating) space. Part of the funding agreement for the PAC was that local organizations would have the opportunity to use the PAC. If this is not happening frequently enough, that agreement should be revisited. The parking is right there, and Cal Poly built the parking structure—not the SLO taxpayers. Also, there is usually no charge to park there.
Lastly, many new venues have come on board in the past 30 years since the recession in 1990—the PAC, the Clark Center in Arroyo Grande, and numerous wineries that cater to local performers. This project has outlived its time and should be shelved along with the cassette tapes and landlines that were in use when it was first conceived. Δ
Leslie Halls is the president of the San Luis Obispo Property and Business Owners Association. Send a response for publication to letters@newtimesslo.com.
This article appears in Mar 9-19, 2023.
The old SLO Jr High gymnasium, is more than adequate to house the SLO Rep venue, and would be affordable to alter the building into a state of the art stage and theatre. Plenty of parking, water and power already established. Also, there is the Principals office if you’re bad.
And…no worry about destroying old SLO historical homes in the process.
Important fact the writer did not consider: SLO Repertory Theatre will have two stages in the new venue, with a total seating capacity of more than 300 seats – more than triple our current capacity.
Pre-pandemic attendance at SLO REP was 20,000 patrons annually. With a tripling of seats, and the ability to produce even more shows every year, our projection of 50,000 patrons annually is conservative. We believe bringing 50,000 people a year downtown benefits all businesses and residents, and will help ensure downtown’s vitality for years to come. For more details about our plans, visit our website at: http://www.slorep.org/a-new-stage/
Kevin Harris, SLO REP Managing Artistic Director
Ms. Halls says that SLO City is ‘technically’ insolvent. That’s technically false. Our city has an AA+ bond rating and pays its bills on time. By Halls’ terminology, anyone with a home mortgage or a car loan is insolvent. The future of our city must accommodate both residents and visitors for social, cultural, and civic activities downtown. The days of big surface lots are over. Build the garage!