[{ "name": "Ad - Medium Rectangle CC01 - 300x250", "id": "AdMediumRectangleCC01300x250", "class": "inlineCenter", "insertPoint": "8", "component": "2963441", "requiredCountToDisplay": "12" },{ "name": "Ad - Medium Rectangle LC01 - 300x250", "id": "AdMediumRectangleCC01300x250", "class": "inlineCenter", "insertPoint": "18", "component": "2963441", "requiredCountToDisplay": "22" },{ "name": "Ad - Medium Rectangle LC09 - 300x250", "id": "AdMediumRectangleLC09300x250", "class": "inlineCenter", "insertPoint": "28", "component": "3252660", "requiredCountToDisplay": "32" }]
#In the past three decades, something remarkable has happened to San Luis Obispo, something unexpected and unusual for a city of its size: It has become a public art Mecca.
Look around and you’ll see art cropping up everywhere. From Jim Jacobson’s simple contemporary “Seven Sisters Railing� on Santa Rosa Street between Marsh and Pacific to Elizabeth MacQueen’s classical “Ironroad Pioneers� in Railroad Square — SLO Town’s public art policy has fostered a remarkable array of public art pieces throughout our community.
In a city facing tough budget problems, one may ask, “Why spend money on art? Why concern ourselves with aesthetics at all?� Why indeed! Why bother with landscaping city parks? Paying for street sweepers? Enforcing architectural review?
#Public art is an extension of who we are, our desire to adorn ourselves with not just sackcloth but with decorative fabrics, jewelry, fashion. It’s human nature (at least for most of us) to worry about appearances. Having the same interest in decorating our public environment as we do ourselves and our homes is perfectly natural.
Many people are responsible for our vibrant public art program, but perhaps no one deserves more credit than Ann Ream, who’s been a tireless supporter as a member of the SLO County Arts Council’s Public Art Committee.
“I’ve witnessed how art in general can influence people’s lives. The thought of walking down the street and encountering a piece of public art, which has the potential to make you pause — something we don’t do very much in our lives — to pause and think about why it’s there, why that design, might lead to critical thinking, not to mention the pure enjoyment of seeing artwork,� explained Ream. “I’ve experienced that feeling in other cities, so when I joined the Art Council, I joined the Visual Arts in Public Places committee, and it has fascinated me to no end to be involved with a group of people sitting around a table talking about art in public places, what it means and how it can benefit a community.�
#Just how does public art benefit a community? In a town like SLO, where tourism is an important element to our economic vitality, a strong public art program can lead to a memorable visit.
“It been fascinating helping make public art a reality in this little burg, which is what it was when I started on this committee,� recalled Ream. “Public art has savored the uniqueness of the downtown space. When I see these artworks, I think, ‘I live here.’ These works are a part of my life and I take ownership of them, take pride in my community, and in pride there’s passion!�
SLO leads the way
#Paso Robles wants one. Pismo Beach hopes to implement one by June. But so far, only SLO Town has a fully realized public art program.
While communities such as Arroyo Grande have loose policies that “strongly encourage� developers to include Public Works-approved art, San Luis Obispo is currently the only community in the county to have a comprehensive policy that requires all new development — both public and private — to set aside a percentage of the cost of capital improvements toward public art.
Former mayor and city councilman Ken Schwartz led the way in promoting public art in the city, and city planner Jeff Hook helmed the first policy requiring a percentage of building costs to go to public art. Later city worker Wendy George took over the program, and currently Betsy Kiser administers the policy.
#“The program started at 1 percent [of total project cost], but then tough financial times hit, and it was suspended altogether,� said Kiser. “In 1995, the program came back at 1 percent, but later the city again faced budget issues, so the city staff proposed cutting the program to one-half a percent, but the City Council said no, instead setting it at three-fourths percent.�
According to Kiser, the three-fourths percent figure is “just a temporary thing.� It may go up to 1 percent again or down depending on budget constraints. “I don’t know what will happen next year,� said Kiser.
San Luis Obispo has three separate programs: The Visual Arts in Public Places program requires public-funded projects to set aside three-fourths of a percent of the total project costs (or capital improvements) to public art; The Public Art in Private Development program requires developers to set aside one-half a percent of the total costs over $100,000 to public art, not to exceed a total of $50,000; and the final program is Private Donation of Public Art, which happened with “Puck� in the Downtown Centre, where a group of local families purchased the piece and donated it to the city.
#“If private developers don’t want to do public art, they pay an in-lieu fee to the public art fund, which can be used in public projects elsewhere,� explained Kiser. “Sometimes the amount due is so small, say $800, that developers can’t buy much with it anyway, so it goes into the fund. Other times, developers choose to spend more on public art than required because they see the value of it.�
All public art, even pieces donated by private developers or citizens, must be approved, such as the case when SLO Marketplace developer Bill Bird offered sculptures of horses and riders for his upcoming project on the Dalidio property. The sculptures, which were created in Texas, were turned down by the selection committee because it felt it didn’t fit.
“The Dalidio farm is ag land, but not really ranch land, and even ranch horses are different than the bucking broncos these two sculptures depicted,� said Kiser.
You can’t please all of the people all of the time …
#Ann Ream’s favorite piece is Kate Britton’s “Garnet,� which became emblematic of the controversy inherent in public art. The piece was originally installed in Old Town Arroyo Grande, but many in that community felt its abstract shapes and message — it was meant as a tribute to breast cancer survivors — were out of character on the quaint street of turn-of-the-century buildings. When Arroyo Grande rejected it, San Luis Obispo happily announced that it would take it, and it did.
Ream’s least favorite public art piece is “The Court of Historic Flags,� a series of bas-relief sculptures surrounding the flagpole in Mission Plaza near the SLO Art Center.
“That doesn’t mean it’s bad art,� explained Ream, “it just doesn’t appeal to me.�
#Therein lies the double-edged sword of public art: People tend to love a piece or hate it. But that’s a good thing according to Kiser, who agrees that public art projects are always contentious.
“Always, always, always — and that’s the beauty of it. You’re stimulating conversation. That’s what art should do: make people think.�
Ream agrees that there’s no way to make everyone happy: “You shouldn’t set your goal in that direction because it’s an impossibility. All the public art literature will tell you that. If you have a diverse group selecting the work, serving on the jury, your public art projects will be a reflection of the community’s diversity as far as taste in art.
“What the Arts Council has done in working with the city is help formulate a procedure when putting together a jury that makes sure it’s diverse — not bureaucratic but democratic. Everyone should have an opinion, and a diverse committee reflects your community: ethnicity, gender — it’s all important when putting together a jury. The other thing that really helps is giving the jury good guidelines and criteria for judging: Is it appropriate in scale for the location, is it vandalism resistant, and so on.�
San Luis Obispo’s program has been slowly developing, moving from the relative safety of sweet representationalism (think Paula Zima’s “Tequski Wa Suwa, Child & Bear� in the Mission Plaza fountain) to boundary-pushing contemporary art (such as Allen Root’s “Ferromobius� on Chorro near Higuera Street).
#“The Art in Public Places committee has worked so hard with the city in coming to this point,� said Ream. “It was important to begin with art that was safe. It was smart to do that. Now we’re getting to the point where there’s more openness and risk-taking, which is exactly what’s happening at the Damon-Garcia Sports Complex.�
In other projects, such as the Marsh Street Parking Garage, the city had set strict thematic guidelines, in that case a transportation theme. For the Damon-Garcia project, the city has offered no thematic guidelines.
“That project is wide open,� said Kiser, during a recent walk-through of the property, where interested artists could get a firsthand look at potential places where public art might be installed.
About a dozen artists showed up, taking copious notes on site maps made available by the city. In addition to Kiser, on hand were project manager Jennifer Lawrence, engineer Dan VanBeveren (city project manager for the facility), and city maintenance worker Jeff Hendricks, who answered questions concerning electrical and water availability, where foundations could and couldn’t be dug, right-of-way concerns for emergency vehicles, and so forth. Aside from such concerns, artists will have a free hand to submit whatever design they wish.
“As a result [of this new artistic freedom], the city has attracted an increasing number of public artists from throughout the country who are requesting notification on public art projects, and that’s fabulous,� said Ream. “I’m hoping in the years to come, we’ll get some art that’s really ‘out there,’ and we’re already heading that way.�
Glen Starkey considers himself public art.
Wax poetic regarding his ugliness at [email protected].