[{ "name": "Ad - Medium Rectangle CC01 - 300x250", "id": "AdMediumRectangleCC01300x250", "class": "inlineCenter", "insertPoint": "8", "component": "2963441", "requiredCountToDisplay": "12" },{ "name": "Ad - Medium Rectangle LC01 - 300x250", "id": "AdMediumRectangleCC01300x250", "class": "inlineCenter", "insertPoint": "18", "component": "2963441", "requiredCountToDisplay": "22" },{ "name": "Ad - Medium Rectangle LC09 - 300x250", "id": "AdMediumRectangleLC09300x250", "class": "inlineCenter", "insertPoint": "28", "component": "3252660", "requiredCountToDisplay": "32" }]
On a recent Thursday, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) levied a record $1.6 billion penalty on PG&E for the 2010 gas pipeline explosion that killed eight in the San Francisco suburb of San Bruno. Since the explosion, PG&E has been issued many safety citations by the CPUC. Not surprisingly the commission plans to launch a formal investigation into the utility’s “culture of safety.”
There are steps that PG&E can take to persuade the commission and the public that it has a genuine culture of safety. Slick public relations ads aren’t among them. Consideration of safety recommendations of CPUC independent peer review panels, on the other hand, are. Last month, such a panel expressed concern regarding the adequacy of PG&E using only two earthquakes in estimating seismic safety at Diablo Canyon and made recommendations to improve the study. PG&E ignored these recommendations and refused follow-up meetings with the CPUC Panel, missing an opportunity to demonstrate commitment to an authentic culture of safety.
-- Milton Carrigan - San Luis Obispo