Jay Bonestell 
Member since Oct 20, 2017


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Defending freedoms?

Good letter. Yes, Al Fonzi is only concerned about protecting "freedoms" that hurt vulnerable people. He wants to defend the freedom of bullies & psychopaths to persecute, to discriminate, to abuse. He cherishes hate speech, the only sort of "free speech" he respects. Fonzi loves & defends neo-Nazis while vilifying anti-Nazi protesters.His attitude reminds me of the mindset of southerners in the Jim Crow era who resented yankee law enforcement agencies who investigated lynchings. The good christian white folks wanted to preserve their freedom to perpetrate torture killings in public squares without interference from the feds.

Posted by Jay Bonestell on 05/03/2018 at 7:27 PM

Re: “Threat to liberty

Hello? you say the Democratic party has been taken over by far left progressives? Well, the republican party has been taken over by clowns, white supremacists, corporatists, religious nutjobs, ethno-nationalists & morons of all sorts. You claim liberals hate free speech , want to ban books & to silence anyone who disagrees with them. This has been the agenda of the far right for decades.Fascists have always threatened & vilified anyone speaking out for social justice,peace,women's rights, racial equality, animal welfare & protecting the environment.Now that some of the more strident leftists are over- reaching & espousing censorship, the righties can't take it.So what does "religious freedom" mean to you, Al Fonzi? Freedom to deny a homosexual person emergency medical care if the doctor is a fundamentalist Christian who "follows his conscience? You evidently adhere to the Bible, seeing it as a divinely inspired moral guide. In your holy book, any girl who is not a virgin on her wedding night is to be killed on her father's doorstep to defend the patriarch's honor. Anyone collecting firewood or doing any other sort of work on the sabbath is to be publicly stoned to death. Your sacred text clearly upholds slavery, commands genocide, condones rape & ethnic cleansing. As far as I know, no one is actually advocating banning the Bible, but lots of compassionate , rational people are not exactly charmed by it. Anyhow, Mr Fonzi, you have NO business criticizing liberals, LGBT folk or anyone else, since your party, your tribe is currently okay with serial adultery, pathological lying, sexual assault, pedophilia & treason as long as the perpetrator has an "R" after his name.

7 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Jay Bonestell on 04/26/2018 at 5:00 PM

Re: “A response to fact-free hyperbole

Langford expressed outrage against "mob rule" but only because the anti-NRA protesters he hates so much comprise the wrong kind of mob,I'm sure he's fine with the sort of mob like we saw last year in Charlottesville VA where a mob of neo-Nazis carrying tiki torches marched through the streets & where one of their number shouting "white shariah!" rammed his car into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing a woman.

Posted by Jay Bonestell on 04/12/2018 at 11:18 PM

Re: “Objection to a 'modest proposal'

Gun fetishists always claim they need their precious killing tools to someday fight against "government tyranny."Of course, to these right wingnuts "government tyranny" means a peaceful, civilized democracy where people have health insurance, a living wage, quality public education, consumer protection, clean air & water & a host of other terrible oppressive things. "Freedom" to gun humpers looks something like what we might see in failed states & war zones. An anarcho-libertarian dickface would feel right at home in a dystopican hellhole like Somalia, Northern Mexico or the tribal regions of eastern Pakistan. In these awful places, there is no centralized stable government & the only law is the rule of the strong over the weak. Places where men with guns cruising in pickup trucks scour a ruined landlooking for plunder & girls to rape . AmeriKKKa's dimwitted, vicious gun lickers say they're prepared to wage war on liberals & the federal government but they couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag. Instead, they prefer to shoot up schools or blow up day care centers. The neoNazi gun worshiping scum are just punks & chickenhawks; lowest of the low.

0 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Jay Bonestell on 04/12/2018 at 11:08 PM

Re: “Instead of saving lives, politics is despicable

Gun fetishists are the lowest form of scum. They & their NRA overlords are depraved psychopaths & utterly despicable. Decent people must never underestimate how evil, stupid & dangerous gun-humping slime are.

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Jay Bonestell on 03/08/2018 at 10:49 PM

Re: “'Hostiles' delivers a gripping Western tale of the clash between Native Americans and their conquerors

This film is set in 1892, a time when the Indian wars were over, but there's a scene where a Commanche war party massacres a settler family, something that no longer occurred in the 1890's.. The last bands of hostile Commanches surrendered incrementally through the 1870's & early 1880's & by the end of that decade, the herds of bison had been all but exterminated & the nomadic warrior tribes that depended on them for sustenance were starved into submission . Well before 1892, the f the last holdouts had laid down their arms & were placed on reservations. Hence, the movie starts out with a historical error.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Jay Bonestell on 02/01/2018 at 9:53 PM

Re: “A systemic problem

Wechter is an unabashed social Darwinist , neo-Nazi & admirer of the alt-right. His misogyny comes natural to him, so no one should be shocked by what he says. Anyhow, Barbie Clark's letter is spot -on.

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Jay Bonestell on 12/14/2017 at 10:46 AM

All Comments »

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.

© 2018 New Times San Luis Obispo
Powered by Foundation