Pin It

Some finer points and questions on belief 

Arroyo Grande

Respectfully, Paul Rinzer’s and Scott Ziering’s letters (“Prove that there isn’t a teapot circling the moon” and “Someone making a positive claim bears the burden,” respectively, Nov. 17) are wrong in a number of important ways. For the record, these two letters reply to Otis Page’s assertions (“The burden of proof is on you, atheists,” Nov. 10) regarding Paul Rinzer’s commentary (“Meet your friendly neighborhood atheists,” Oct. 19).

First, Rinzer’s gracious admission “I do not claim to have proof that there is no god” confirms his doubt whether there is One.

Second, Ziering’s assertion that Page’s “argument” is a logical fallacy is incorrect. “Argumentum ad Populum, If many believe so, it is so” is a fallacy only if the belief is wrong. But where many believe something is true, when in fact the objective of the belief is a fact and true, there is no fallacy.

Further, Ziering asserts that “it is impossible to prove a negative statement” that God does not exist. But isn’t that the precise point that atheists assert? That God does not exist? How can they justify their belief if they can’t prove it except by ignoring the evidence?

-- Ken Goodman - Arroyo Grande

-- Ken Goodman - Arroyo Grande

-- Ken Goodman - Arroyo Grande

Readers Poll

Do you think the SLO County Board of Supervisors should have gone against their policy that states funding for independent special districts should not result in a net fiscal loss to the county?

  • A. Yes, the housing and job opportunity the Dana Reserve is bringing is important
  • B. No, it's giving special privileges to the Nipomo Community Services District
  • C. I trust them, they know what's best for the county
  • D. What's going on?

View Results

Pin It


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Search, Find, Enjoy

Submit an event

More by Ken Goodman

Trending Now