Safe or sorry?
Lucia Mar Unified School District plans to serve
irradiated beef in school lunches beginning in January
BY SHAWNA GALASSI
PHOTOS BY CHRISTOPHER GARDNER
'DON'T BUY IT' Lorraine Kitman, whose
son attends Harloe Elementary in Arroyo Grande, is spearheading a drive
to keep the irradiated beef out of Lucia Mar.
Ground beef zapped by high doses of gamma rays will likely be served
to students purchasing lunches in the Lucia Mar Unified School District
in 2004.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is touting irradiation as a safe
and effective means of controlling E. coli and other food-borne bacteria,
and plans to offer it through the National School Lunch Program beginning
in January.
Judy Stephens, director of food services and purchasing for Lucia Mar,
says she will buy the irradiated beef as soon as it is available. She
is convinced that irradiated food is perfectly safe and so far has felt
no need to query parents or notify them of her decision.
Nor is she required to notify them.
Curiously, the FDA requires irradiated meat sold in stores to be labeled,
but there are no federal regulations requiring schools to disclose its
use.
This does not sit well with critics of irradiation, such as the nonprofit
groups Public Citizen and Food for Safety, who point to studies that
show it can cause cancer and may have many other harmful effects, the
scope of which won 't be evident for decades.
Lorraine Kitman, whose son attends Harloe Elementary in Arroyo Grande,
is spearheading a drive to keep the irradiated beef out of Lucia Mar.
She is incredulous that Lucia Mar plans to serve it when the Los Angeles
Unified School Board voted unanimously to ban irradiated beef and San
Diego Unified has indicated they have no plans to purchase it next year.
"This warrants further discussion, Kitman said. "At the
very least, don 't buy it this year."
Kitman is particularly upset that the decision to purchase the irradiated
beef was quietly made without consulting parents. The only reason she
found out was because she called the district to find out its position
after reading a work-related notice that said irradiated beef had been
approved for schools.
"This warrants proactive discussion," Kitman said. "Here
I am a parent having to bring it [the issue] to them. Had I not, there
would have been no conversation. It would have just been happening."
After speaking with Stephens on the phone, Kitman said she was "alarmed
by the sense she was so completely unwilling to admit there was any
reason for concerns." It was then that Kitman made the decision
to speak out.
"If I had gotten any sense she was taking my concerns and listening
to them, I wouldn 't have felt I had to do something," Kitman
said.
Kitman, who has mounds of material on irradiation, is concerned about
studies she has read that show irradiation can cause genetic damage,
tumor growth, and internal bleeding, among other things.
Due to Kitman 's concerns, the principal of Harloe Elementary,
Juan Olivarria, arranged to have Stephens speak at a PTA meeting. But,
according to Kitman, instead of advertising Stephens ' presentation
in the PTA flier as a discussion on irradiation, the topic was presented
as "Nutritional Information and School Meals" with only
a small mention of irradiated meat. And no efforts were made to include
parents from other schools in the district.
FACTS, NOT FEAR Judy Stephens,
director of food services for Lucia Mar Unified School District,
is convinced that irradiated food is perfectly safe and plans to
buy the irradiated beef as soon as it becomes available. |
At the meeting, Stephens discussed her reasons for supporting the use
of irradiated ground beef. Like many who favor it, she feels it is necessary
to prevent a repeat of the 1992 E. coli outbreak at Jack in the Box
that left three children dead and several hundred hospitalized.
"Our staff is educated and careful, but it only takes a little
bit to cause problems," Stephens said.
She said irradiation has been studied for 50 years and the studies
show it is not harmful to the food or to those who eat it. She likened
the process to having teeth X-rayed or luggage put through an airport
scanner. "Your teeth don 't become radiated any more than
the food does. No residue is left behind."
Stephens feels that irradiation has "gotten a bad rap for nonscientific
reasons," and that political activist groups have been "actively
spreading misinformation and fear among consumers.
"I 'm concerned with people making decisions based on fear
rather than scientific fact," she said.
But critics of irradiation can cite numerous studies that have proven
the process unsafe, or at best warn that further research is needed.
Some studies have shown that animals given irradiated foods exhibit
a wide range of problems, including rare forms of cancer, genetic damage,
organ malfunctions, and vitamin deficiencies.
Those opposed to irradiated food are also concerned that the process
causes the formation of "radiolytic products" that are produced
when food is irradiated. Radiolytic products are chemicals that do not
naturally occur in food and are thought by many to be carcinogenic.
In his book "Understanding the Dangers of Food Irradiation,"
Dr. Gary Gibbs warns that formaldehyde and benzene, two such chemicals,
have been linked to cancer. He asserts that exposure to formaldehyde
has been shown to cause cancer in animals and benzene has been associated
with an increased incidence of leukemia.
Gibbs refers to a 1970s study in India in which malnourished children
were fed irradiated wheat. Within one month, 80 percent of them developed
abnormal white blood cells associated with leukemia.
This does not bode well for the scores of malnourished children from
low-income families who rely on subsidized school lunches.
Studies also show that irradiation diminishes the nutritive value of
foods. Once again, this directly impacts low-income children who have
no alternative to school lunches and are often most in need of maximally
nutritious meals.
While Stephens and other supporters of irradiation take comfort in
the fact that it is endorsed by the FDA and the USDA, detractors are
quick to point out that consumers have been misled in the past.
LUNCH
TIME The USDA touts irradiation as safe; there is no regulation
requiring schools to notify parents of its use in school lunches.
|
"For years women were told estrogen was safe, now we 're
told it 's bad for women. And for years we were told tobacco was
safe," said Carmela Vignocchi, a retired school administrator.
Vignocchi said she is concerned that Lucia Mar plans to serve irradiated
meat to school children when there hasn 't been adequate research
or information about what effects it will have on their development.
"I don 't think children should be used as lab experiments,"
she said.
Vignocchi said she intends to take the matter up with the school board.
Ann Steele, a substitute teacher who objects to Lucia Mar 's decision,
said she too will approach the school board.
"You want only the best items being consumed by a growing body,"
Steele said. "The best quality, color, presentation. Irradiated
meat is not up to that quality."
Steele is familiar with studies showing that irradiation is patently
unsafe.
"I think it 's very dangerous in the sense we 're not
going to have children ill suddenly," Steele said. "But
at some point in these children 's future they will experience
some sort of health deterioration."
Tracy Lerman, an organizer for Public Citizen 's Stop Food Irradiation
Campaign, says that irradiated beef is being served in the schools because
of pressure from food irradiation companies and food industry lobbying
groups.
According to Lerman, consumers have rejected irradiated beef sold in
grocery stores, so now schools are being targeted. She said that Sen.
Tom Harkin, who hails from Iowa, a state with two large irradiation
facilities, inserted a two-paragraph measure onto the end of a 1,200-page
farm bill allowing for the sale of irradiated beef to school districts.
"I believe the measure got into the farm bill because this provides
them with a humongous market," Lerman said. "It [irradiation]
doesn 't have to be disclosed in schools. They don 't have
to worry about consumer acceptance."
(An assistant at Sen. Harkin 's Washington D.C. office confirmed
that he did insert the measure and Iowa does have two irradiation facilities.)
A check on four other school districts in the area revealed that as
of yet none have decided to purchase irradiated ground beef next year.
Louise Mayhew, assistant director of Food Services for Atascadero Unified,
said there haven 't been enough studies on it.
"I know they say it 's not harmful, but I think it 's
too much of an unknown," she said. "You know how the FDA
is. They say, 'Oh, it 's safe. ' And then they say,
'Oh no, it 's not safe. ' I 'd much rather go with
the tried and true."
The food service directors for San Luis Coastal, Coast Unified, and
Templeton all said they need more information before going in that direction.
Rod Blackner, the director of Food Services for Paso Robles, said the
district already has its allotment of ground beef for the year, but
they would have no problem serving irradiated meat.
"It 's very acceptable," he said. "In fact,
it 's probably something we should do. It 's a more responsible
way to work with ground beef."
If they do decide to use irradiated ground beef, Blackner said they
would not notify parents.
"We don 't see it as an issue," he said.
And for some parents it 's not an issue. Beverly Beaudoin, whose
son attends Harloe Elementary, said she is all for schools serving irradiated
ground beef.
"I would rather take chances with hamburger passed through a
process than bury my child from eating a hamburger that had E. coli,"
she said.
But she does think parents should be informed that irradiated ground
beef is being used.
"Someone who may object to it should know so they have the option
of packing a lunch," she said. "Not telling anyone and just
serving it up is skirting the issue."
Lerman suggests that parents who object to irradiated food being served
in their school district contact the principal of their school as well
as the food service director for the district and the school board.
She also urged parents to write their elected officials.
"Let them know this is something you don 't want your kids
to eat," she said. "Unfortunately [parents] have to protect
children from school lunches."
For those interested in more information, Kitman will have an informational
table at the We the Planet Tour at Cal Poly, Nov. 9 at 6:30 p.m. She
will also be gathering signatures for a petition calling for a moratorium
against irradiated meat in SLO County schools. For more information,
call: 471-3698. ³
Contributing writer Shawna Galassi doesn 't serve her family food
that glows in the dark.