Tuesday, July 28, 2015     Volume: 29, Issue: 52
Signup

Weekly Poll
What do you look for when you’re picking out a wine?

Hints of tobacco, notes of ripe cherry and dried currant, and a great mouth feel.
Something that’s cheap, so I won’t feel guilty after drinking the whole bottle.
A great label with an artistic touch and keen descriptors always gets me.
I don’t care, just hand over the box.

Vote! | Poll Results

RSS Feeds

Latest News RSS
Current Issue RSS

Special Features
Delicious
Search or post SLO County food and wine establishments

New Times / News

The following article was posted on September 4th, 2013, in the New Times - Volume 28, Issue 6 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from New Times [newtimesslo.com] - Volume 28, Issue 6

Monning’s farmworker protection bill clears Legislature

BY PATRICK M. KLEMZ

State Sen. Bill Monning (D-Carmel) wanted to give agricultural workers a hand in collecting back wages and penalties owed by state-licensed farm labor contractors.

During recent bill hearings, Monning explained that some California farm labor contractors have fraudulently dissolved and moved their assets to new corporations. Actual farmworkers owed back wages by these dissolved contractors were left with nobody to file a claim against.

“This measure is modeled after previous legislation in the garment manufacturing and car wash industries to address fraudulent successor business scams,” Monning said Aug. 14. “The workers most affected and victimized by such unscrupulous practices are farmworkers.”

Senate Bill 168 would hold successor corporations liable for debts held by businesses reorganized under or acquired by that company. After clearing the California Assembly on Aug. 26, SB 168 made its final pass through the Senate floor on Aug. 30. The bill now awaits a signature from Gov. Jerry Brown.

The final floor votes over SB 168 split cleanly along party lines. Republican lawmakers opposed the bill because they say it would harm California’s $43.5 billion agricultural industry.

Several agricultural lobbies still opposed SB 168 at passage. The California Farm Bureau removed its opposition after recent amendments.