Thursday, September 18, 2014     Volume: 29, Issue: 8
Signup
Featured Slideshow

Slideshow

Panga Boat Bust 9/6

Weekly Poll
Should police be allowed to use surplus military equipment?

Cheap or free gear for local police? Sounds good to me.
No. Police are meant to serve the people, not to threaten them.
If they use it properly I don’t see any reason why not, but I don’t feel comfortable seeing cops with assault rifles.
Nothing says democracy like a bayonet to the butt.

Vote! | Poll Results

RSS Feeds

Latest News RSS
Current Issue RSS

Special Features
Delicious
Search or post SLO County food and wine establishments

New Times / News

The following article was posted on July 17th, 2013, in the New Times - Volume 27, Issue 52 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from New Times [newtimesslo.com] - Volume 27, Issue 52

Citizens challenge Spanish Springs plan amendments

By Patrick M. Klemz

Opponents of a large Price Canyon housing development under consideration in Pismo Beach filed a petition on July 16 to undo a recent City Council step toward project approval.

City officials confirmed the petition to stop Spanish Springs contained more than the 546 signatures needed to put the issue on the ballot—a number equaling one-tenth of registered Pismo Beach voters. After verifying the signatures, the city must decide whether to include the measure in the upcoming general election or at some other time.

The petition doesn’t seek to challenge final approval of the project, which hasn’t yet come. Rather, it’s challenging just one necessary step already undertaken.

After a June 18 public hearing that lasted into the morning hours, the Pismo Beach City Council voted to certify the Spanish Springs environmental impact report and to amend the city’s general plan to allow for building to commence once the Spanish Springs property becomes a part of Pismo Beach. However, the council stopped short of voting to annex the project site.

Spanish Springs opponents want voters to undo the general plan amendments, which would effectively kill the project.