Monday, May 22, 2017     Volume: 31, Issue: 43

Weekly Poll
Does the Las Pilitas Quarry project deserve the second chance?

No. The Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission already shot it down the first time.
Yes, but only if the county approves the smaller, alternative proposal for the quarry.
The county should approve the quarry project at its full size.
I don't care either way.

Vote! | Poll Results

RSS Feeds

Latest News RSS
Current Issue RSS

Special Features
Search or post SLO County food and wine establishments

New Times / News

The following article was posted on March 24th, 2010, in the New Times - Volume 24, Issue 30 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from New Times [] - Volume 24, Issue 30

Air pollution board accepts dune study


The SLO County Air Pollution Control Board on March 24 voted to receive and file a controversial study which blames off-road vehicles for poor air quality in the Nipomo Mesa. Mesa residents concerned about the air pollution filled the room, leaving their signs reading ‘No OHVs’ and ‘Health Over Recreation!’ abandoned outside the San Luis Obispo County building.

The 9-1 vote ultimately directs staff to investigate steps the county can take to improve the air quality and encourage cooperation with the California State Parks Department. Two board members, Jan Marx and Joe Costello, were absent.

Though questions were raised about components of the study from members of the Board and audience, lead APCD administrator Larry Allen said no scientific study can prove something with 100-percent certainty, but the overwhelming weight of evidence points to off-road vehicles as the cause of high concentrations of particulate matter in the Nipomo Mesa atmosphere.

“I have heard challenges to the process [of how the study was done], but not any contradictory evidence,” said Board member and District Three supervisor Adam Hill. “I can’t in good conscience tell Nipomo residents to wait on this. Public health is our most essential duty—it takes precedence over everything.”

The only member to vote against the motion was Pismo Beach Councilman Kris Vardas, who said he’s “not quite sure we’ve reached the perfection we can achieve” in the study. Vardas said he would like to see the Board further review public comments in moving forward.

Pismo Beach City Councilman Ed Waage presented questions about the study to Allen and head APCD researcher Joel Craig, including queries about seasonal variation in particulates.

Researchers will return to the next Board meeting May 19 to further address public comments.