Wednesday, September 17, 2014     Volume: 29, Issue: 7
Signup
Featured Slideshow

Slideshow

Panga Boat Bust 9/6

Weekly Poll
Should police be allowed to use surplus military equipment?

Cheap or free gear for local police? Sounds good to me.
No. Police are meant to serve the people, not to threaten them.
If they use it properly I don’t see any reason why not, but I don’t feel comfortable seeing cops with assault rifles.
Nothing says democracy like a bayonet to the butt.

Vote! | Poll Results

RSS Feeds

Latest News RSS
Current Issue RSS

Special Features
Delicious
Search or post SLO County food and wine establishments

New Times / News

The following article was posted on January 15th, 2014, in the New Times - Volume 28, Issue 25 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from New Times [newtimesslo.com] - Volume 28, Issue 25

Atascadero takes a fine-toothed comb to its Draft Climate Action Plan

BY JONO KINKADE


FINE-TOOTHED COMBS
Atascadero City Council strips language from Draft Climate Action Plan.
PHOTO BY JONO KINKADE

The agenda item before the Atascadero City Council included “climate” and “action” in the title, but related public comment brought no mention of Agenda 21 or ICLEI. Rather, the four people who spoke on the city’s Draft Climate Action Plan at the Jan. 14 meeting had fond words for the city and its goal for carbon reductions.

Then the council members had their turn. Heather Moreno and Roberta Fonzi brought out the red pens in an editing session that removed hundreds of words—including entire paragraphs—that made any mention of human involvement in climate change, the effects it has on the community, or the potential benefits enjoyed by the city for the plan’s adoption.

Moreno led the charge, flanked by Fonzi, in saying that the council and staff had been open to creating a plan—as required by the state—before it got politicized.

“In the plan before us, there’s a lot of filler in here, there’s a lot of politically charged statements that don’t really add anything to the plan,” Moreno said. “They are really just opinion, and they aren’t necessary.”

One line struck from the executive summary, found early on in the 261-page document, reads: “The [Climate Action Plan] will also help achieve multiple community goals such as lowering energy costs, reducing air pollution, supporting local economic development, and improving public health and quality of life.” The strike-throughs continued, covering both general and more specific statements.

The plan, known as CAP, outlines a strategy for the city to meet the state’s requirements under AB 32, a bill requiring cities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Atascadero’s draft CAP identified the potential to reduce 28,873 metric tons of emissions, though a 18,737-metric-ton drop would satisfy the requirements. A consultant used a “tool box” to calculate various actions leading to reductions, such as increasing energy efficiency in residential and city buidlings and reducing vehicle trips in the city.

The actual plan for reductions wasn’t at issue—just certain language in the plan.

Moreno challenged words in a background section that discussed rising temperatures, contesting that “there has been science saying that it hasn’t warmed.”

Council Member Bob Kelley questioned how much of any warming is caused by human activity, citing such other contributors as volcanoes.

“I don’t know how much of this green gas stuff is a cause of it,” Kelley said. “I think it’s Mother Nature that causes it, too.”

The editing went on for more than two hours, absent a vote of approval. The council will revisit the plan and its proposed changes on Jan. 28, after Mayor Tom O’Malley, who led the council in discussing the CAP piece by piece, suggested they give the public time to review the changes.

After the discussion, O’Malley asked the public if they had more to add—something the mayor may do when the council addresses large items. A sole audience member spoke: Ray Weymann, a retired astronomer.

“In all candor, I think much of this discussion is really disingenuous, I think far from what you are doing is removing the politics from this,” Weymann said. “I think what you are doing is injecting them.”