Sunday, February 26, 2017     Volume: 31, Issue: 31

Weekly Poll
What gets you most fired up politically?

When vulnerable populations are threatened by politicians
Unnecessary taxes and government overreach
Abuse of the environment

Vote! | Poll Results

RSS Feeds

Latest News RSS
Current Issue RSS

Special Features
Search or post SLO County food and wine establishments

New Times / Letter To The Editor

The following article was posted on January 16th, 2013, in the New Times - Volume 27, Issue 25 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from New Times [] - Volume 27, Issue 25

Watch those amendments

San Luis Obispo

By Jeff Bunler

The madness of senseless violence we’ve seen this past year is disturbing and unacceptable. In each event, we are left to wonder why this happened and how we can stop it. There is no simple solution. The “gun culture” in America permeates us and has taken root like crabgrass in our lawns. And no one is blameless. We’ve grown up with TV shows like Have Gun, Will Travel, The Rifleman, and Gunsmoke. We ban children from R-rated movies like Bonnie and Clyde, Terminator, and Scarface, and then offer them as DVDs on Amazon and eBay. We watch nightly news programs that show us gang violence, drug cartel wars, and international terrorists living among us. And now we have video games with names like Mortal Kombat, Assassin’s Creed, Halo, and Medal of Honor that blend realistic weapons with fantasy.

Those “olde, white guys” in Philadelphia back in the middle of the 18th century were pretty sharp. They crafted a government that still works after more than 200 years. They built in safeguards to protect us from an oppressive and despotic government. And they built in some safeguards to protect us from ourselves. “Gun control”—like abortion and gay marriage—is an emotional and thorny issue. Every form of media will wrap itself in First Amendment rights and defend its product. In order to deal effectively with our violent society, I submit we need to discuss modifying (or “tinkering with”) the First Amendment.

What? You don’t like that idea? Why not? You’re talking about doing it with the Second.