Thursday, February 26, 2015     Volume: 29, Issue: 31
Signup
Featured Slideshow

Slideshow

SLO Airport

View All Slideshows

Weekly Poll
Do police and the public have the same perception of use of force?

The police are generally too aggressive.
Police do what they have to in order to make arrests, and it’s not always pretty.
Some police are good; others are far too quick to violence.
Only when it’s on TV, set to reggae music.

Vote! | Poll Results

RSS Feeds

Latest News RSS
Current Issue RSS

Special Features
Delicious
Search or post SLO County food and wine establishments

New Times / Letter To The Editor

The following article was posted on January 3rd, 2013, in the New Times - Volume 27, Issue 23 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from New Times [newtimesslo.com] - Volume 27, Issue 23

Wood you believe this?

San Luis Obispo

Ken Hermann

In mid-December I received a copy of a “Special Notice” from the California State Board of Equalization, about a new use tax assessment, the “Lumber and Engineered Wood Products 1 Percent Assessment. (Yes, that is a $1 tax on every $100 spent.)

Starting January 2013, we will be taxed an additional 1 percent on many lumber products that are sold or transported into the state.

With further investigation, I found that Assembly Bill 1492 sets regulations for the recovery of fire suppression costs, extends the lifespan of timber harvest plans, and establishes a Public Resources Code, section, the “Timer Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund.”

This new fund is set up to provide for actions, regulations, and practices of the departments of Forestry and Fish and Game that currently exist, and are themselves funded through existing taxes and forest management fees. These fees, paid by forest landowners and management companies, are then passed to lumber consumers in the form of retail pricing.

Additionally, “The initial emergency regulation and the one readoption of an emergency regulation authorized by this section shall be exempt from review by the Office of Administrative Law.”

This double taxation bill has been quickly jabbed into us with virtually no comment or evaluation period, without considering alternatives, and to charge for things previously paid. It’s a side-deal slush fund to the general fund.

This splinter needs to be plucked out and thrown back at the boards from which it came.