Sunday, December 11, 2016     Volume: 31, Issue: 20

Weekly Poll
Should Ethnobotanica be allowed to open a medical marijuana dispensary in Nipomo?

Yes. The Board of Supervisors bought into law enforcement's bogus scare tactics and made the wrong decision.
They should be allowed to open their dispensary, but not in Nipomo. That place has enough problems as it is.
No. The county should limit marijuana availability to mobile delivery services only.
Ban all marijuana! I've watched Reefer Madness enough times to know it's dangerous!

Vote! | Poll Results

RSS Feeds

Latest News RSS
Current Issue RSS

Special Features
Search or post SLO County food and wine establishments

New Times / Letter To The Editor

The following article was posted on July 9th, 2014, in the New Times - Volume 28, Issue 50 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from New Times [] - Volume 28, Issue 50

The Second Amendment was an afterthought

By Joseph Rank - Grover Beach

Greg Larson’s response (“What did Adolph Hitler have to say about gun control?” June 26) to Art Tyree’s letter to the editor of June 19 (“Yosemite Sam deniers and tyranny criers”) contains many factual errors. The most obvious and commonly cited one by gun advocates is the assumption that the Second Amendment is the overarching rule in this matter. The be-all and end-all. It is not.

Remember, the Second Amendment is just that: an afterthought following what was prescribed in the original Constitution.

Here are the relevant passages:

Article I, Section 8: “To provide for calling the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; To provide for organising, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress ... .”

And Article II, Section 2: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into actual Service of the Untied States ... .”

The Second Amendment has nothing to do with “individual rights.” The word “people” is collective, meaning all of us, much as “militia” could not be construed to be a single individual or individuals.

“People” and “militia” are plural. If the framers had meant otherwise, they would have written and codified the language as “persons” or “individuals.”

Hackneyed, anecdotal quotes are just immaterial.