View All Slideshows
New Times / Letter To The Editor
The following articles were printed from New Times [newtimesslo.com] - Volume 28, Issue 50
Be skeptical of PR packaged as reviews
By Michael Seden-Hansen - Paso Robles
I enjoy the film section of New Times, both for the fun commentary on films and the general information on new releases. On a few occasions, I feel New Times has done a disservice by printing promotional material that reflects what the filmmakers would like one to think a film is about, rather than a snapshot of the actual film. The recent Son of God used a publicity statement as the mini-review, without making that clear up-front. Some time back, a blurb on a political (and politicized) documentary did the same.
In the July 3 issue of New Times, the new documentary film America was billed as an exploration of alternate history (“what if America had lost the Revolutionary War?”), but per online reviews (such as at rogerebert.com), the film barely touches on that topic; instead, it’s a screed against purveyors of anti-American history (i.e. history that acknowledges rather than denies the darker elements of the nation’s past). The film also demonizes the long-dead Saul Alinsky and ties Hillary Clinton to him. New Times would do the public a service by approaching political and religious material packaged as mass entertainment with more skepticism.
Political Watch 11/26/2015 Community Notebook 11/26/15 - 12/3/15 Hobnobbing with Helen Santa Maria Area Transit system is in line for fare and route changes Jordan Farms in Lompoc put under agricultural conservation easement Lompoc drops exclusive negotiating contract with California Space Center String of gang-related shootings in Santa Maria leaves 17-year-old dead