Wednesday, October 1, 2014     Volume: 29, Issue: 9
Featured Slideshow


Panga Boat Bust 9/6

Weekly Poll
Are you in favor of U.S. military action in the Middle East?

I would be if we hadn’t just pulled troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Only if it means police have to give guns back to the military.

Vote! | Poll Results

RSS Feeds

Latest News RSS
Current Issue RSS

Special Features
Search or post SLO County food and wine establishments

New Times / Letters to the Editor

Meetings don't have to be long

Janice Peters - Morro Bay -

Regarding your Aug. 28 article, “’Round midnight,” on the length of city council meetings, I sat on the Morro Bay City Council for 14 years, the last six as mayor, and in all that time we seldom went past 11 p.m.—or if we did, it was only for 10 minutes or so to finish an ongoing discussion item.

Not only is it unfair to people who wanted to comment on an issue but gave up and went home, it’s also unfair to the staff, who have to be at their desks at 8 a.m. the following morning (let alone the costs of those on hourly retainers!). Equally important is the fact that it’s very difficult to have logical discussions and make good decisions six hours into a meeting, when everyone is tired—especially those councilmembers who have full-time jobs.

For Mayor Irons to blame the staff reports is disingenuous. The staff creates their reports based on city standards and policies and the direction of the council. If a councilmember is unclear about a report, it is the councilmember’s responsibility to meet with staff and discuss it before the council meeting. If they then feel there is something in the staff report that should be clarified or given more detail, they can either explain that themselves at the meeting or ask staff to do so.

The mayor’s job is to run the meeting. I always set estimated times for each agenda item, told the council in advance how much time we had to cover an item, and asked the councilmembers themselves to limit their comments accordingly. This eliminated much of the repetitiveness Councilmember Nancy Johnson mentioned. If we were going over the estimated time on an issue, I’d either ask for a decision, bring the matter back later in the meeting if time allowed, or, if possible, continue it to another date.

Public input is valuable, but there are ways to limit the time taken to receive it. On controversial issues, speaker slips can be issued and speaking time limited based on the number of speakers. It also proved very effective to encourage people who agreed with speakers to raise their hands, so not everyone has to get up and repeat the same thing, but the number of supporters is very obvious to the council.

I take issue with Professor Michael Latner’s contention that council decisions are made before any public comment is offered. While I always studied the materials and spoke with staff and constituents beforehand, I never completely made up my mind on issues until after weighing both public comments and those of my fellow councilmembers. Ironically, I was sometimes criticized for changing my initial thoughts on an issue because of the subsequent discussion—damned if you do and damned if you don’t!

Council meetings can be productive and of reasonable length if the mayor does his/her homework and keeps control of the proceedings, as indicated by Mayor Picanco and others. Mayor Irons had no council experience before his election, so hopefully in his second term he will develop his own process for shorter and more efficient meetings, to the benefit of all of us.

Vote yes on Measure H-14

Sherry Richison - Pismo Beach -

I hope all Pismo Beach residents take the time to listen to Shelly Higginbothan, Mary Weiss, and Kris Vardas respond to questions from citizens on Channel 20 from the League of Women Voters at a recent “Meet the Candidates” forum. When these three were asked about keeping Price Canyon free of developers and suburban sprawl, they said they listened to the will of the people. They made it sound like they really cared about what was said for more than two years of overwhelming public comments against Spanish Springs, but they did not say they had changed their minds about the Spanish Springs project.

In reality, as Sheila Blake and Marcia Guthrie pointed out, it took a referendum with more than 1,000 signatures to make them rescind their decision to add hundreds of homes, a hotel, a golf course, etc., to this pristine area. Never doubt that if Higginbotham, Weiss, and Vardas are re-elected, they are still proponents of big development.

Voting yes for Measure H-14 is the only way to guarantee that all citizens may vote their preferences and put the control of public lands and public funds back in the hands of residents.

Compton can't be serious

Istar Holliday - Arroyo Grande -

Lynn Compton has been running for SLO County District 4 Supervisor for at least seven months now. One would think she’d make some effort during this time to learn the job.

Before the June primary, her platform was reduction of taxes and regulations on small businesses “to keep jobs from leaving the county.” In my 20-plus years of attending the meetings of the SLO Board of Supervisors, I must have missed the one in which they discussed raising taxes on or regulating small business. I thought that was a state or city council function.

Recently, I noticed other large placards where she claims to “care” and will preserve Proposition 13, saving it from “them,” implying her opponent, Caren Ray, is one of “them.” First, a robo call from Supervisor Ray, in answer to the billboards, responded by reaffirming her own continued support for Proposition 13, but, most importantly, candidate Compton doesn’t have a clue that Proposition 13 is a state law that, to be changed, needs to arise in the state Legislature and, as a state tax, needs to be confirmed by the state’s voters, and that  the county Board of Supervisors, doesn’t have a thing to do with “saving” or “dumping” Proposition 13.

My conclusion is that candidate Compton has no idea of the duties of the office she covets, or, if she does, she has no moral compass and is just making stuff up to frighten the voters who have less info than she does into voting for her.

Either way, I intend to vote to elect Supervisor Ray, who is both experienced and effective, and has also proven herself smart, accessible, responsive, and ethical, and I suggest those of you in SLO County District 4 do, as well.